WATTREX
InvestorsRequest RFP
// Agrivoltaics / Dual-use landKarbala pilot · 18-month dataset
, Crop + Solar

The same land
grows both.

Elevated photovoltaic arrays over working cropland. Food and power, on the same hectare. Our 18-month Karbala pilot measured a 60% productivity uplift versus the crop-only control field , without sacrificing crop yield.

160%
Crop + Solar productivity
240ha
Erbil greenhouse footprint
18mo
Operating dataset
8°C
Avg. shaded-zone cooling
29%
Evaporation reduction
01 / Premise

We don't pick between food and power.

Agrivoltaics solves the land-use trade-off that conventional ground-mount solar can't. Done well, the solar array helps the crops underneath , and the landowner earns two revenue streams from the same parcel.

, Microclimate

Shade is a feature.

Partial shade from elevated panels reduces ambient soil temperature, cuts irrigation demand, and protects sensitive crops from peak-irradiance damage.

  • Reduces heat stress
  • Reduces evaporation
  • Extends growing windows
, Dual-use land

Two revenue streams.

The landowner gets crop revenue and a share of the energy revenue. The developer gets a permitting story that survives community consultation.

  • Co-revenue contracts
  • Landowner participation
  • Faster permitting
, Energy yield

Bifacial gains.

Crops underneath reflect diffuse light onto the rear-side of bifacial panels , measured gains of 4–7% on yield versus equivalent ground-mount in our pilots.

  • Bifacial advantage
  • Higher PR in cool seasons
  • Lower panel temp
02 / Pilot study, KRD_142 · Erbil

Erbil agrivoltaic greenhouse.
240 hectares. 18 months. Audited.

The Wattrex flagship for the dual-use thesis. Elevated arrays above climate-controlled greenhouses, paired with conventional ground-mount on adjacent parcels for a like-for-like comparison.

Erbil agrivoltaic greenhouse — elevated PV arrays over cropland, Kurdistan, IraqKRD_142 · Erbil · 36.18°N
240 ha · elevated bifacial · 142 MWpPR 86.4%

Measured outcomes, 18-month period:

  • +60%

    Combined revenue per hectare vs. crop-only control.

  • −29%

    Irrigation water demand in shaded zones.

  • PR 86%

    Performance ratio , above design target, helped by bifacial rear gain.

  • −8°C

    Average ambient cooling in greenhouse shaded zones during peak summer.

Request the full audit report
03 / Design principles

How we design an agrivoltaic system.

01Agronomy

Crop selection first.

We pick the array geometry to fit the crop , not the other way round. The agronomist signs off before the engineer.

  • Crop-shade tolerance
  • Irrigation modelling
  • Pollinator pathways
02Geometry

Elevation & spacing.

Row-spacing tuned to the cropping calendar. Elevation high enough for tractor access where it matters; low enough to stay economic.

  • Tractor clearance ≥ 4 m
  • Variable row spacing
  • Single-axis tracker option
03Revenue

Co-revenue contracts.

Landowner participation written into the PPA. The crop revenue stays with the landowner; a share of generation revenue too.

  • Landowner share %
  • Crop revenue retained
  • Audit hooks
04Operation

Continuous yield monitoring.

Crop yield + energy yield both telemetered. Lessons fed back into the next site's design.

  • Crop-yield baseline
  • Energy yield
  • Annual yield report
Agrivoltaic cropland in Iraq — elevated PV arrays above active farmland
IRQ_AGR · Kurdistan Region · 240 ha

Elevated arrays. Active farmland. Two revenue streams on the same hectare.

, For landowners & cooperatives

Co-revenue contracts on the land you already farm.

You keep the crop. We share the energy revenue. The land is more productive than it was before , measurably.

, For developers

Agrivoltaics is a permitting story your community will accept.

Pure ground-mount solar increasingly fails community-consultation hurdles. Agrivoltaics tells a story the consultation committee will sign.